1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 298 N.J.
  5. 298 N.J. Super. 658 (1997)
 

LOMBARDO v. BORSKY

298 N.J. Super. 658 (1997)

VICTORIA LOMBARDO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. DR. MARTIN BORSKY AND ST. PETER'S MEDICAL CENTER, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 20, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Galex argued the cause for appellant (Galex, Tortoreti and Tomes, attorneys; Mr. Galex, on the brief).

Jeremy P. Cooley argued the cause for respondent Dr. Martin Borsky (Lenox, Socey, Wilgus, Formidoni & Casey, attorneys; Rudolph A. Socey, Jr., of counsel; Mr. Cooley and James J. Breslin, III, on the brief).

Respondent St. Peter's Medical Center did not file a brief.

Before Judges PRESSLER, STERN and HUMPHREYS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing her complaint against defendants, Martin Borsky, M.D., and St. Peter's Medical Center, alleging the failure to obtain informed consent before Dr. Borsky implanted an experimental intraocular lens into plaintiff's right eye.1 The order was entered after a "Lopez hearing." See Lopez v. Swyer, 62 N.J. 267

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases