1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 243 A.D.2d
  5. 243 A.D.2d 697 (1997)
 

PURIFICATI v. MEYER & DIESENHOUSE

243 A.D.2d 697 (1997)

665 N.Y.S.2d 308

John Purificati, Appellant, v. Meyer & Diesenhouse et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Anthony Toots Labella, Third-Party Defendant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

October 27, 1997

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

For the defendants in a legal malpractice case to succeed on a motion for summary judgment, they must present evidence in admissible form establishing that the plaintiff is unable to prove one of the three essential elements of a malpractice cause of action (see, Greene v Payne, Wood & Littlejohn, 197 A.D.2d 664; see also, Platt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases