1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 53 Cal.App.4th
  5. 53 Cal.App.4th 883 (1997)
 

BRADLEY v. LACY

Docket No. C022867.

53 Cal.App.4th 883 (1997)

WILLIAM S. BRADLEY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. GARY L. LACY, as District Attorney, etc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 25, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Richard D. Birdsall, Sinclair, Wilson, Sinclair & Bedore and Lawrence T. Ring for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Julia P. Gibbs, James B. Beal and Steven R. Phipps as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Daniel E. Lungren, Attorney General, George Williamson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Robert R. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General, Michael J. Weinberger and W. Scott Thorpe, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J. —

I

Government Code section 3063 specifies the procedure to be followed after the grand jury has found an accusation: "The district attorney shall have a copy of the accusation served upon the defendant, and by notice in writing shall require the accused to appear before the superior court of the county, at a time stated in the notice, and answer the accusation. Appearance shall not be required...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases