1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.
  4. 548 Pa.
  5. 548 Pa. 378 (1997)
 

MUSKO v. MUSKO

548 Pa. 378 (1997)

697 A.2d 255

Richard P. MUSKO, Appellant, v. Naomi B. MUSKO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided June 18, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo M. Stepanian, Butler, for Richard P. Musko.

Norman D. Jaffe, Butler, for Naomi B. Musko.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO and NEWMAN, JJ.

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Chief Justice.1

The sole question before the court is whether a valid antenuptial agreement which states that a spouse "shall not be entitled to receive any money or property or alimony or support" in the event of divorce or separation precludes the award of alimony pendente lite (APL).

Richard and Naomi Musko were married on January 5, 1991...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases