1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 573 N.W.2d
  5. 573 N.W.2d 348 (1997)
 

TERRY v. CITY OF DETROIT

Docket Nos. 186535, 195210.

573 N.W.2d 348 (1997)

226 Mich. App. 418

Constance TERRY, Latonya Burkes, a/k/a Latonya Burkes, Emmet Burkes, and Helen Burkes, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellee, and General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Charles Blunt, Curtis Thompson, Carl Webster, Stanley Knox, Darrell Patterson, Cadillac Motor Car Division, LC Taylor Ambulance Service, Stewart McLaren, and Barbara Michaels, Defendants. Constance TERRY, Latonya Burkes, a/k/a Latonya Burkes, Emmet Burkes, Co-Conservator, and Helen Burkes, Co-Conservator, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. CITY OF DETROIT, Defendant-Appellant, and General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellee, and Charles R. Blunt, Curtis Thompson, Carl Webster, Stanley Knox, Darrell Patterson, Cadillac Motor Car Division, LC Taylor Ambulance Service, Stewart McLaren and Barbara Michaels, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Michigan.

Decided November 18, 1997, at 9:00 a.m.

Released for Publication February 10, 1998.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David A. Robinson, Cornelius Pitts and Elaine Carlis, Detroit, for Plaintiffs-Appellees.

William J. Liedel, P.C. by William J. Liedel and Patricia M. Jason, Detroit, for City of Detroit.

Feeney Kellett Wienner & Bush by S. Thomas Wienner, Peter M. Kellett, and David N. Goltz, Bloomfield Hills, for General Motors Corp.

Before YOUNG, P.J., and GRIBBS and STANLEY J. LATREILLE, JJ.

YOUNG, Presiding Judge.

In these consolidated appeals, defendant General Motors Corporation (GM) in Docket No. 186535 appeals by leave granted the circuit court order denying in part its motion for summary disposition in this negligence action.1 Defendant City of Detroit in Docket No. 195210 appeals by leave granted the circuit court order denying its motion for summary disposition. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for further...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases