1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 55 Cal.App.4th
  5. 55 Cal.App.4th 853 (1997)
 

KURINIJ v. HANNA & MORTON

Docket No. B101724.

55 Cal.App.4th 853 (1997)

WASYL KURINIJ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. HANNA AND MORTON, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

June 10, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Paul & Janofsky, Gary M. Paul, John S. Janofsky, Lewis, Goldberg & Ball and Michael L. Goldberg for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Haight, Brown & Bonesteel, John Sheller, Rita Gunasekaran, Hanna and Morton, Edward S. Renwick, James P. Modisette and David A. Ossentjuk for Defendant and Respondent.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

OPINION

HASTINGS, J.

In April 1994, Wasyl Kurinij filed a legal malpractice complaint against respondent, the law firm of Hanna and Morton (H&M) claiming that H&M had negligently represented him in litigation arising out of his acts as a former owner of the company USA Petroleum Corporation. In turn, H&M filed a cross-complaint against appellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases