1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 566 N.W.2d
  5. 566 N.W.2d 341 (1997)
 

EVEREST DEVELOPMENT v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE

No. C5-96-2535.

566 N.W.2d 341 (1997)

EVEREST DEVELOPMENT, LTD., Appellant, v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

July 15, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George O. Ludcke, Thomas W. Pahl, Kelly & Berens, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Roger A. Jensen, Peterson, Bell, Converse & Jensen, St. Paul, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by NORTON, P.J., and PETERSON and AMUNDSON, JJ.

OPINION

NORTON, Judge.

In this action under the Government Data Practices Act, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion to compel production of documents prepared to settle a lawsuit between the City of Roseville and a prospective developer. We reverse.

FACTS

In 1986, the Centre Pointe Investment Company (CPIC) and Business Park Limited Partnership entered a development agreement with the City of Roseville...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases