Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to preserve for appellate review his claim that the trial court erred in admitting the testimony of two witnesses regarding his habitual drug use (see, CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the claim is without merit. Although, in general, evidence of uncharged crimes is not admissible, the testimony regarding the defendant's prior drug use was admissible as it was relevant on the issue of his motive in committing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.