BONCZEK v. CARTER-WALLACE, INC.


304 N.J. Super. 593 (1997)

ROBERT BONCZEK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. CARTER-WALLACE, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 22, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Thompson (Collier, Shannon, Rill & Scott) of the Washington, D.C. bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for appellant (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohn, Fisher & Boylan, and Mr. Thompson, attorneys; Gregory B. Reilly, of counsel; William J. Rodgers and Mr. Thompson, of counsel and on the brief; Amy C. Grossman, on the brief).

Eric M. Nelson of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent (Whitman, Breed, Abbott & Morgan, attorneys; Mr. Nelson, Kevin F. Kostyn and Sally G. Blinken, of counsel; Andrew Muscato, on the brief).

Before Judges LANDAU, NEWMAN and COLLESTER.


The opinion of the court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D.

Plaintiff Richard Bonczek appeals from the grant of summary judgment dismissing his complaint against defendant Carter-Wallace, Inc. which asserted breach of an employment contract and sought application of a promissory estoppel claim against Carter-Wallace. Bonczek's appeal also challenges the denial of his request to amend the complaint to join a new party, Ralph Levine, and to add a count for intentional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases