REHN v. FISCHLEY

No. C0-95-813.

557 N.W.2d 328 (1997)

Garry M. REHN, Respondent, v. Barbara FISCHLEY, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff, Petitioner, Appellant, v. GREATER ANOKA COUNTY ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY, Third-Party Defendant, Petitioner, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

January 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert E. Kuderer, Teresa M. Croke, Johnson & Condon, P.A., Kevin P. Keenan, Charles E. Lundberg, Bassford, Lockhart, Truesdell & Briggs, P.A., Minneapolis, for appellant.

William Starr, Starr & Fleagle, P.L.C., Charles A. Beckjord, Charles A. Beckjord, Attorneys at Law, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Jeffrey D. Hedlund, Faegre & Benson, L.L.P., Minneapolis, amicus curiae.

Heard, considered and decided by the court en banc.


OPINION

TOMLJANOVICH, Justice.

Appellants, Dr. Barbara Fischley and the Greater Anoka County Animal Humane Society ("Humane Society"), seek review of the court of appeals' reversal of the trial court's directed verdict in favor of Dr. Fischley. Respondent Garry M. Rehn claimed he was injured after using formalin to disinfect cat cages at the Humane Society in January 1993. Rehn alleged that Dr. Fischley was negligent in: 1) recommending the use of formalin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases