Petitioner, a police officer, was injured when he moved a case of flares and, thereafter, applied for performance of duty disability retirement benefits. Respondent denied petitioner's application upon a finding that petitioner was not permanently incapacitated from performing his duties as a police officer. It was for respondent to evaluate the conflicting medical testimony presented by the medical experts and accept the opinion of one medical expert over the other (see...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
