DI MA CORP. v. CITY OF ST. CLOUD

No. C2-96-1584.

562 N.W.2d 312 (1997)

DI MA CORP., et al., Appellants, v. The CITY OF ST. CLOUD, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Dismissed June 5, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Randall D.B. Tigue, Randall Tigue Law Office, P.A., Minneapolis, for Appellants.

Douglas J. Schiltz, Joseph B. Marshall, Marshall & Associates, P.A., Circle Pines, for Respondent.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and RANDALL, and FOLEY, JJ.


OPINION

DANIEL F. FOLEY, Judge.*

DI MA Corporation, Malcolm, Inc., and Compel Corporation brought this action challenging the constitutionality of the City of St. Cloud's ordinances regulating adult use establishments. In addition, in relevant part, DI MA and Malcolm sought injunctive relief against the city to prevent enforcement of the amortization ordinance, and Compel sought damages against the city because its club was temporarily...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases