1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.4th
  4. 52 Cal.App.4th
  5. 52 Cal.App.4th 820 (1997)
 

MATTCO FORGE, INC. v. ARTHUR YOUNG & CO.

Docket No. B087488.

52 Cal.App.4th 820 (1997)

MATTCO FORGE, INC., Plaintiff and Respondent; MATEO MINGUEZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Three.

February 7, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, Kent L. Richland, Robin Meadow, Randel L. Ledesma, O'Neill, Lysaght & Sun, J. Joseph Connolly and John M. Moscarino for Plaintiff and Appellant and for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Kathryn A. Oberly, Daniel M. Gray, Stephen N. Young, Bruce M. Cormier, Eugene R. Erbstoesser, Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, M. Laurence Popofsky, Miles N. Ruthberg and Peter W. Devereaux for Defendants and Appellants.

OPINION

KLEIN, P.J.

Appellants and cross-respondents Arthur Young & Company, Richard E. Lamping, Thomas W. Blumer and Ernst & Young (collectively Arthur Young) appeal the judgment following jury verdicts in favor of respondent Mattco Forge, Inc. (Mattco).1

Because of prejudicial instructional error, the judgment is reversed, except for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases