WHITFIELD v. CITY OF NEW YORK


90 N.Y.2d 777 (1997)

689 N.E.2d 515

666 N.Y.S.2d 545

Gary Whitfield, Respondent, v. City of New York, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided December 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Crotty, Corporation Counsel of New York City (Janet L. Zaleon and Barry P. Schwartz of counsel), for appellant.

Leon D. Lazer, Melville, Zachary Murdock and Regina L. Darby, New York City, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

This motion for leave to appeal by defendant City of New York presents a recurring finality issue regarding a particular type of conditional order. Specifically involved is the finality of an Appellate Division order reversing a judgment and directing a new trial unless a party stipulates to a different damages award. The fundamental finality problem with such an order is that it is not self-executing. It cannot...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases