Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the trial court did not err in closing the courtroom during the testimony of an undercover officer. The undercover officer testified, at a closure hearing, that he would soon be returning to the area of the defendant's arrest, that he was active in the area of the courthouse, that he had been threatened, and that he had subjects lost from this case and others. This testimony sufficiently...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
