Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court properly found that the plaintiff is collaterally estopped by his previous criminal conviction of assault in the second degree, resisting arrest, and driving while ability impaired, from now relitigating the lawfulness of that arrest and prosecution. Upon his conviction for resisting arrest, the jury necessarily decided that the arrest was authorized and premised on probable cause (see, People...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
