1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 109 F.3d
  5. 109 F.3d 739 (1997)
 

TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS v. TIMES FIBER COMMUNICATIONS

Nos. 96-1201, 96-1203.

109 F.3d 739 (1997)

TRILOGY COMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TIMES FIBER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., and LPL Technologies, Inc., Defendants/Cross-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined April 28, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George C. Summerfield, Jr., Pennie & Edmonds, Washington, D.C., argued, for plaintiff-appellant. Of counsel was H.T. Than.

Charles R. Wolfe, Jr., Bacon & Thomas, Alexandria, VA and John C. Henegan, Butler, Snow, O'Mara, Stevens & Cannada, PLLC, Jackson, MS, argued, for defendants/cross-appellants. With them on the brief was J. Cal Mayo, Jr., Attorney-At-Law, Oxford, MS.

Before PLAGER, LOURIE, and SCHALL, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined April 28, 1997.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Trilogy Communications, Inc. appeals from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi, Trilogy Communications, Inc. v. Times Fiber Communications, Inc., No. J91-0542(W)(S) (S.D.Miss. Dec. 1, 1995), holding Trilogy's two U.S. patents, 3,567,846 and 3,693,250, not infringed by products manufactured and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases