Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, testimony concerning his fingerprint was properly admitted into evidence although the actual record containing the print was not offered into evidence. The testimony was based on a business record and thus constituted an exception to the rule against hearsay (see, CPLR 4518 [a]; Prince, Richardson on Evidence § 8-301 [Farrell 11th ed]). Additionally, a proper foundation was...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.