LISS v. FELD

No. 95-CV-1330.

691 A.2d 145 (1997)

Fulton LISS, Appellant, v. Karen FELD, Appellee.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided March 27, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia M. Thornton, for appellant.

Norman L. Blumenfeld, Washington, DC, for appellee.

Before FERREN, STEADMAN, and KING, Associate Judges.


KING, Associate Judge:

Appellant Fulton Liss contends that a praecipe rejecting an arbitration award and demanding trial de novo, which was filed on his behalf in the Civil Division after-hours box within the time frame specified by the governing rule, was timely filed, and that the arbitration judgment entered against him after the praecipe was not forwarded to the Multi-Door Division office was improperly entered. We agree and therefore hold that, under the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases