MATTER OF MERSON v. McNALLY


90 N.Y.2d 742 (1997)

688 N.E.2d 479

665 N.Y.S.2d 605

In the Matter of Lawrence Merson et al., Respondents, v. Donald F. McNally et al., Respondents; Philipstown Industrial Park, Inc., Intervenor-Appellant. In the Matter of Philipstown Industrial Park, Inc., Appellant, v. Town Board of Town of Philipstown et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided October 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L. L. P., Albany (Robert J. Alessi and Michele L. Anderson of counsel), Van DeWater & Van DeWater, Poughkeepsie (Ronald C. Blass, Jr., of counsel), and Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman, L. L. P., New York City (J. Kevin Healy and Philip E. Karmel of counsel), for intervenor-appellant in the first above-entitled proceeding.

John A. Porco, P. C., Carmel (Robert C. Lusardi of counsel), for Lawrence Merson and others, respondents in the first above-entitled proceeding.

Rivkin, Radler & Kremer, Uniondale (Evan H. Krinick, Perry Balagur and Merril Schapiro Biscone of counsel), for New York State Builders Association, Inc., amicus curiae in the first above-entitled proceeding.

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L. L. P., Albany (Robert J. Alessi and Michele L. Anderson of counsel), Van DeWater & Van DeWater, Poughkeepsie (Ronald C. Blass, Jr., of counsel), and Robinson, Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman, L. L. P., New York City (J. Kevin Healy and Philip E. Karmel of counsel), for appellant in the second above-entitled proceeding.

Richard I. Goldsand, Brewster, for respondents in the second above-entitled proceeding.

Chief Judge KAYE and Judges TITONE, BELLACOSA, LEVINE, CIPARICK and WESLEY concur.


SMITH, J.

We hold that, under certain circumstances, a negative declaration may be issued under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) even where the project — a Type I action — has been modified during the initial review process to accommodate environmental concerns of the lead agency and other interested parties.

In the first case, Matter of Merson v McNally, we conclude...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases