GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR v. FRIED

Docket No. 105562.

570 N.W.2d 262 (1997)

GRIEVANCE ADMINISTRATOR, Attorney Grievance Commission, State of Michigan, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Harold S. FRIED, Charles J. Golden and James J. Rostash, Respondents-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

November 18, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Philip J. Thomas, Grievance Administrator, and Richard L. Cunningham, Associate Counsel, Detroit, for plaintiff-appellant.

Colista, Adams & Palmer, P.C. by F. Phillip Colista and Elizabeth L. Sokol, Royal Oak, for respondent-appellee Fried.

Nearpass & Hudson, P.C. by Leslie J. Nearpass, Temperance, for respondent-appellee Golden.

Kenneth M. Mogill, Detroit, for respondent-appellee Rostach.


OPINION

PER CURIAM.

The Grievance Administrator seeks to discipline several lawyers for taking improper steps to obtain the recusal of two circuit judges. A hearing panel granted summary disposition in favor of the lawyers, and the Attorney Discipline Board affirmed. We reverse the judgment of summary disposition, and remand this case to the hearing panel for further proceedings.

I

In a formal complaint, the Grievance Administrator alleges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases