Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant failed to establish the need for the testimony of Officer Baran, an identifying witness, at the Wade hearing. All of the relevant facts necessary to render a determination were elicited from the officers who did testify at the hearing. Thus, the court did not err in denying the defendant's application to compel Officer Baran's testimony (see, People v Chipp,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.