LOSO v. LaFROSCIA


236 A.D.2d 594 (1997)

654 N.Y.S.2d 681

Kathleen Loso, Appellant, v. Dolores E. LaFroscia, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

February 24, 1997


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The weight to be afforded to the conflicting testimony of experts is a matter peculiarly within the province of the jury (see, Stringile v Rothman, 142 A.D.2d 637, 640). Contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the jury's verdict was amply supported by the evidence adduced at the trial (see, Nicastro v Park, 113 A.D.2d 129<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases