Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that the evidence was not legally sufficient to support his conviction because the testimony of the prosecution witnesses was incredible as a matter of law. However, the defendant's general motion to dismiss the indictment at the close of the People's case lacked the specificity required to preserve this issue for appellate review (see, People v Torres,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.