DONTZIN v. MYER


301 N.J. Super. 501 (1997)

BENJAMIN DONTZIN AND NANCY DONTZIN, PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. WILLIAM MYER AND SUSAN MYER, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 23, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Gurshman argued the cause for appellants (Mr. Gurshman, on the brief).

Robert M. Benbrook argued the cause for respondents (Benbrook & Benbrook, attorneys; Sieglinde K. Rath, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, D'ANNUNZIO and NEWMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by D'ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.

Defendants appeal, pursuant to leave granted, from an order granting plaintiffs' motion to compel the deposition of defendant William Myer and his attorney, Henry Gurshman, "with respect to matters falling within the attorney client privilege."

Plaintiffs, Benjamin Dontzin and his wife Nancy, entered into a contract with defendants, William Myer and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases