1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 121 F.3d
  5. 121 F.3d 675 (1997)
 

SCOSCHE INDUSTRIES, INC. v. VISOR GEAR INC.

No. 97-1003.

121 F.3d 675 (1997)

SCOSCHE INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VISOR GEAR INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

August 11, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kamran Fattahi, Kelly, Bauersfeld & Lowry, Woodland Hills, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was John D. Bauersfeld.

James J.S. Holmes, Sedgwick, Detert, Moran & Arnold, Los Angeles, CA, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was Carolyn M. Mason.

Before NEWMAN, CLEVENGER, and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

This case began when appellant Scosche Industries, Inc., filed an action in the United States District Court for the Central District of California seeking a declaratory judgment that a design patent owned by appellee Visor Gear, Inc., is invalid and that Scosche's products do not infringe Visor Gear's patent. Scosche also sought damages for acts of alleged unfair competition by Visor Gear. After Visor Gear filed a counterclaim alleging patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases