Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in granting the defendant's cross motion for leave to serve an amended answer in order to assert an affirmative defense of release (see, CPLR 3025 [b]; Edenwald Contr. Co. v City of New York,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.