Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant claims that the complainant bolstered his own identification testimony by stating that he observed the defendant at the police station. Since the defendant did not object to the challenged testimony, his claim of error in this regard is not preserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Bostic,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.