1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 121 F.3d
  5. 121 F.3d 669 (1997)
 

AKTIEBOLAG v. E.J. CO.

No. 97-1168.

121 F.3d 669 (1997)

Sandvik AKTIEBOLAG, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E.J. COMPANY, Vira Hayes and Robert Hayes, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing Declined October 16, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ronald L. Grudziecki, Burns, Doane, Swecker & Mathis, LLP, Alexandria, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Allan Madis Soobert. Of counsel was I.C. Waddey, Jr., Waddey & Patterson, Nashville, TN.

Robert E. Pitts, Pitts & Brittian, P.C., Knoxville, TN, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on brief were R. Bradford Brittian, Melinda L. Doss, and Raymond E. Stephens. Of counsel on brief was Hal D. Hardin, Nashville, TN.

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, MICHEL, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

Rehearing Denied; Suggestion for Rehearing In Banc Declined October 16, 1997.

ARCHER, Chief Judge.

Sandvik Aktiebolag (Sandvik) appeals the order of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, No. 3-94-1076, granting summary judgment of noninfringement in favor of defendant E.J. Company (E.J.). The district court held that United States Patent No. 4,222,690 (the '690 patent) and United States Patent No. 4,381,162 (the '162 patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases