STATE v. JAGODINSKY

No. 96-2927-CR.

209 Wis.2d 577 (1997)

563 N.W.2d 188

STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. James JAGODINSKY, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided March 26, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

On behalf of the defendant-appellant, the cause was submitted on the briefs of Dennis Schertz of Schertz Law Office of Oshkosh.

On behalf of the plaintiff-respondent, the cause was submitted on the brief of Thomas J. Gritton, deputy district attorney.

Before Snyder, P.J., Brown and Nettesheim, JJ.


BROWN, J.

James Jagodinsky appeals from a judgment of conviction for violating a harassment injunction. Jagodinsky claims that the trial court erred when it denied his objection to the prosecutor's use of peremptory strikes to remove men from the jury pool. We conclude that the prosecutor failed to meet his burden under Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986), of providing a sufficient explanation of why each of his strikes was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases