CHEN v. CHEN


297 N.J. Super. 480 (1997)

HUI MEI HUNG CHEN, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT/CROSS-APPELLANT, v. MICHAEL CHEN, A/K/A YIH-TZUN CHEN, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT/CROSS-RESPONDENT, AND ANNIE MU-EN CHEN, SCOTT KUAN-CHI CHEN, AND BEN HONG BIN CHEN, INTERVENORS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 14, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Vincent P. Celli argued the cause for appellant (Mr. Celli, attorney, and on the brief; Shivaun M. McConnell, on the brief).

Thaddeus R. Maciag argued the cause for respondent (Maciag & Associates, attorneys; Mr. Maciag, of counsel and on the brief; Karen Cornyn Formisano, on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL, BAIME, and BRAITHWAITE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BAIME, J.A.D.

This appeal and cross-appeal arise out of a judgment of the Family Part confirming certain aspects of an arbitrator's decision and modifying others. We are satisfied that the arbitrator "imperfectly exercised [her] powers" and that the Family Part erred by failing to vacate the award. N.J.S.A. 2A:24-8.

I.

Plaintiff Hui Mei Chen and defendant Michael Chen, both citizens of Taiwan, were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases