TURSI v. PERLA


241 A.D.2d 518 (1997)

663 N.Y.S.2d 984

Noel Tursi, Appellant, v. Daniel V. Perla, Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

July 21, 1997


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

According due deference to the trial court on matters of credibility, we conclude that the trial court's findings, including the determination that there was no contract between the parties, are not against the weight of the evidence or contrary to law. Therefore, they will not be disturbed (see, Brooklyn & Queens El. Co. v Excel Assocs., 115 A.D.2d 630).

The plaintiff's remaining contentions are either raised for the first time on appeal, and thus, not considered, or without merit.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases