HANEBRINK v. BROWN SHOE CO.

No. 96-2654.

110 F.3d 644 (1997)

Ronald H. HANEBRINK, Appellant, v. BROWN SHOE COMPANY, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided April 14, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eli Karsh, Clayton, MO, argued (Stanley E. Goldstein, on the brief), for appellant.

Thomas C. Walsh, St. Louis, MO, argued (Mark S. Deiermann, Timothy A. Garnett, on the brief), for appellee.

Before HANSEN and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges, and MELLOY, District Judge.


MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Ronald Hanebrink, the plaintiff in an age discrimination lawsuit, appeals the district court's2 grant of summary judgment to the defendants. We affirm.

I.

In 1955, Mr. Hanebrink began a long career with Brown Shoe Company ("Brown"). Although Mr. Hanebrink started as a mail clerk, he later transferred to the purchasing department and ultimately became a buyer. As a buyer, Mr. Hanebrink...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases