1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 561 N.W.2d
  5. 561 N.W.2d 192 (1997)
 

HARVEY v. DOTS, INC.

Nos. C0-96-2331, C0-96-2359.

561 N.W.2d 192 (1997)

Gwendolyn HARVEY, Respondent, v. DOTS, INC., d/b/a Dots Department Store; et al., Respondents (C0-96-2331), Appellants (C0-96-2359), Pyramid Security & Protection Inc., Appellant (C0-96-2331), Respondent (C0-96-2359).

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

March 25, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul A. Banker, Arthur, Chapman, Kettering, Smetak & Pikala, P.A., Minneapolis, for Pyramid Security and Protection, Inc.

D. Scott Ballou, Louise A. Behrendt, Stich, Angell, Kreidler, Brownson & Ballou, P.A., Minneapolis, for Dots, Inc., d/b/a Dots Department Store and Bobbie Gee, Inc.

Gene P. Bradt, Robert J. Monson, Hansen, Dordell, Bradt, Odlaug & Bradt, P.L.L.P., St. Paul, for Gwendolyn Harvey.

Considered and decided by TOUSSAINT, P.J., and RANDALL and DAVIES, JJ.

SPECIAL TERM OPINION

TOUSSAINT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the district court's denial of an immunity-based motion for summary judgment under Minn.Stat. § 629.366 (1994). Because appellants are not governmental entities, they are not entitled to immediate appeal of the order. We dismiss the appeal.

FACTS

Respondent Harvey was detained by appellant Pyramid Security on suspicion of shoplifting from appellant Dots, Inc. Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases