1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 307 N.J.
  5. 307 N.J. Super. 438 (1997)
 

E Z SOCKETS, INC. v. BRIGHTON-BEST SOCKET SCREW MFG., INC.

307 N.J. Super. 438 (1997)

E Z SOCKETS, INC., PLAINTIFF/APPELLANT, v. BRIGHTON-BEST SOCKET SCREW MFG., INC., PERRY ROSENSTEIN AND LAKSHMI PRECISION SCREWS LTD., DEFENDANTS/RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided December 31, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Melvin Greenberg argued the cause for appellant (Greenberg Dauber & Epstein, attorneys; Mr. Greenberg and Jeffrey S. Berkowitz, on the brief).

Douglas S. Eakley argued the cause for respondents (Lowenstein, Sandler, Kohl, Fisher & Boylan, attorneys; Mr. Eakley, of counsel and on the brief; Lauren M. Hollender, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, CONLEY and WALLACE.

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff filed a complaint against defendants alleging antitrust violations and tortious interference with plaintiff's prospective economic benefit. The motion judge granted defendants' motion for summary judgment, holding that while plaintiff had alleged a vertical restraint of trade, it had failed to prove by the "rule of reason" test or by the "per se" violation test, that defendants' conduct constituted a vertical price-fixing agreement. Further,...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases