ROSENSHEIN ASSOCIATES v. BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK


304 N.J. Super. 438 (1997)

ROSENSHEIN ASSOCIATES, PALISADES PARK SQUARE CORPORATION AND ROSENSHEIN FIRST DEVELOPMENT CORP., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS, v. BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND MAYOR AND COUNCIL OF THE BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK, PLANNING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK AND ZONING BOARD OF THE BOROUGH OF PALISADES PARK, DEFENDANTS, AND DAVID H. BEREZIN, AMELIA BENEDUCI, DOMINIC PICINICH AND GORDANA PICINICH, INTERVENORS/CROSS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 26, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph J. Rotolo argued the cause for appellant.

Frederick L. Bernstein argued the cause for intervenor/cross-appellant.

Christine Gillen argued the cause for respondent (Diktas Gillen, attorneys; Ms. Gillen, on the brief).

Before Judges PRESSLER, WALLACE and CARCHMAN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.S.C. (Temporarily Assigned).

Defendant Borough of Palisades Park (Borough) and intervenors David H. Berezin, Amelia Beneduci, Dominic Picinich and Gordana Picinich (intervenors) appeal from a judgment of the Law Division granting to plaintiffs, Rosenshein Associates, Palisades Park Square Corporation and Rosenshein First Development Corp. (plaintiffs) relief a) declaring the Borough's land use ordinances unconstitutional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases