IOWA SUPREME COURT BD. v. PARKER

No. 96-1760.

558 N.W.2d 183 (1997)

IOWA SUPREME COURT BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT, Complainant, v. Richard O. PARKER, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Iowa.

January 22, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman Bastemeyer and Charles Harrington, Des Moines, for complainant.

Lee Gaudineer, Des Moines, for respondent.

Considered by HARRIS, P.J., and CARTER, LAVORATO, SNELL, and TERNUS, JJ.


CARTER, Justice.

This lawyer disciplinary opinion is issued pursuant to our review of the findings, conclusions, and recommendation for discipline rendered by a division of the Grievance Commission of this court. In the absence of an appeal, such reviews are conducted pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 118.10 and are de novo. The respondent is attorney Richard O. Parker.

The complaint alleged that respondent violated...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases