1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 303 N.J.
  5. 303 N.J. Super. 430 (1997)
 

STATE v. JALKIEWICZ

303 N.J. Super. 430 (1997)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JOSEPH F. JALKIEWICZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 21, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stephen G. Raymond, Burlington County Prosecutor, attorney for appellant (Robert S. Van Gilst, of counsel and on the brief).

Sitzler and Sitzler, attorneys for respondent (Scott R. McMurtry, on the brief).

Before Judges KING, KEEFE and CONLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KEEFE, J.A.D.

Relying upon the Law Division opinion of State v. Broadley, 281 N.J.Super. 230, 656 A.2d 1319 (Law Div. 1992), the Law Division judge in this case determined that defendant's breathalyzer readings were inadmissible in his prosecution for driving while under the influence because the Mt. Laurel Township Police Department

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases