RAGOSTO v. TRIBOROUGH BRIDGE


173 Misc.2d 560 (1997)

663 N.Y.S.2d 462

Louis J. Ragosto, Appellant, v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

April 17, 1997


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Louis J. Ragosto, appellant pro se.

OSTRAU, P. J., FREEDMAN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

Order dated September 16, 1996 affirmed, without costs.

Pursuant to the terms of General Municipal Law § 50-e (1) (a), the plaintiff was required to serve a notice of claim within 90 days of the occurrence because his small claims action — seeking damages against various employees of the Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority for "harassment" — was one "founded upon tort" and because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases