ZIMMERMAN v. PLOTKIN


244 A.D.2d 481 (1997)

665 N.Y.S.2d 916

Rose Zimmerman et al., Respondents, v. Samuel Plotkin et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

November 17, 1997


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

We are unpersuaded by the defendants' argument that there was no valid line of reasoning from which the jury could have found in favor of the plaintiffs. Moreover, the jury's finding that the defendants maintained their stairway in a dangerous condition, and that this dangerous condition was a proximate cause of the injury to the plaintiff Rose Zimmerman, was supported by a fair interpretation of the credible evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases