NAB CONSTR. CORP. v. CONSOL. EDISON CO. OF NEW YORK, INC.


242 A.D.2d 480 (1997)

662 N.Y.S.2d 471

Nab Construction Corp., Respondent, v. Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 23, 1997


Issues of fact exist as to whether defendant acted reasonably to mitigate its damages, including when defendant first became aware of plaintiff's nonperformance of the contract, and, once aware, whether its method of mitigation was reasonable (see, Bernstein v Freudman, 180 A.D.2d 420). Defendant does not demonstrate or even allege prejudice or surprise by the requested amendment (CPLR 3025 [b]; Fahey v County of Ontario...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases