BOGARD v. PAUL


242 A.D.2d 479 (1997)

662 N.Y.S.2d 475

Ronald Bogard, Appellant, v. Rodman W. Paul, Jr., et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 23, 1997


The meaning and effect of the disputed buy-out provision are clearly within the scope of the broad arbitration clause, and its claimed misinterpretation by the arbitrator as a buyer-initiated rather than a seller-initiated provision is not a ground for judicial interference (see, Matter of Silverman [Benmor Coats], 61 N.Y.2d 299, 307-308). Nor is it a ground for interference that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases