MATTER OF DUKE


305 N.J. Super. 407 (1997)

IN THE MATTER OF THE TRUST FOR THE BENEFIT OF DORIS DUKE, ET AL., UNDER INDENTURE AND DEED OF TRUST OF PERSONALTY DATED DECEMBER 11, 1924 OF JAMES B. DUKE.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 16, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Benjamin P. Michel argued the cause for appellant Chandi Duke Heffner (Riker, Danzig, Scherer, Hyland & Perretti, attorneys; Mr. Michel, Robert D. Borteck and Sabrina H. Perel, on the brief).

Wayne A. Cross (Dewey Ballantine) of the New York bar, admitted pro hac vice, argued the cause for respondent The Duke Endowment (Harold & Haines, attorneys; Gordon A. Millspaugh, Jr., Glenn R. Gordon, and Mr. Cross, of counsel; Gordon A. Millspaugh, Jr., on the brief).

Richard Kahn argued the cause for respondents Trustees of the Doris Duke Trust (Pitney, Hardin, Kipp & Szuch, attorneys; James C. Pitney and Lynn C. Halpern, on the brief).

Before Judges DREIER, D'ANNUNZIO and NEWMAN.


PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Chandi Duke Heffner, appeals from a summary judgment dismissing her claim to be declared a "lineal descendant" of Doris Duke, and therefore the current beneficiary of Doris Duke's share of a trust established in 1924 by her father, the late James B. Duke. Heffner also appeals from certain ancillary orders relating to the Trustees and their counsel.

After considering the record on appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases