Ordered that the appeal from the order dated March 8, 1995, is dismissed, as that order was superseded by the order dated September 11, 1996, made upon reargument; and it is further,
Ordered that the appeal from so much of the order dated September 11, 1996, as denied the plaintiff's motion to vacate the alleged decision is dismissed, as no appeal lies from that portion of the order (see, Matter of Neiman v Backer,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.