HALLINGBY v. HALLINGBY


242 A.D.2d 463 (1997)

662 N.Y.S.2d 52

Paul Hallingby, Jr., Respondent, v. Mai V. Hallingby, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

September 18, 1997


Under the subject settlement agreement, plaintiff was made "solely responsible" for selling the apartment and given "sole discretion" to "determine marketing and the terms of sale". No claim is made by defendant that plaintiff has not made a good faith effort to sell the apartment. While the agreement does not place a time limit on the duration of that effort, neither does it require that the property be sold for any particular amount; it simply sets forth how the proceeds...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases