Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
In light of the strong policy favoring disposition of actions on the merits, and upon our review of the unique circumstances present, we find that the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant's motion and partially granting the cross motion by the New York City Commissioner of Social Services (see, CPLR 2004; Przyjemski v Surowaniec, ...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
