ROSO v. HENNING

No. 19934.

566 N.W.2d 136 (1997)

1997 SD 82

Eric A. ROSO, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Daniel HENNING and Veblen Cheese Factory, Inc., Defendants and Appellants.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

Decided July 9, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy J. Turbak of Turbak Law Office, Watertown, for plaintiff and appellee.

Steven M. Johnson, Mark F. Marshall of Johnson, Heidepriem, Miner, Marlow & Janklow, Sioux Falls, for defendants and appellants.


KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] Following service of a summons and complaint with no response, plaintiff obtained a default judgment without notice to defendants. Yet before suit, plaintiff and defendants' insurer engaged in settlement negotiations. Was this a sufficient "appearance" to require notice before taking a default judgment? We conclude these negotiations constituted an appearance, and defendants' failure to respond resulted from excusable neglect. We therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases