The motion was properly granted upon findings of an excusable lack of awareness on the part of incoming counsel that the case had been marked off the calendar, activity during the period the case was off calendar sufficient to show that there was no intention to abandon it, lack of prejudice to defendants as a result of the delay in restoring the case, and a meritorious cause of action (see, Rutger Fabrics Corp. v United States Laminating Corp.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ENDRES v. MINGLES REST. LTD.
242 A.D.2d 455 (1997)
662 N.Y.S.2d 43
Suzanne Endres et al., Respondents, v. Mingles Restaurant Ltd. et al., Appellants
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
September 16, 1997
September 16, 1997
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
