REUTTER v. CRANDEL

No. 96-35118.

109 F.3d 575 (1997)

David REUTTER, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles CRANDEL, Respondent-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided March 21, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mary C. Geddes, Assistant Federal Defender, Anchorage, Alaska, for the petitioner-appellant.

Bruce M. Botelho, Attorney General, and Nancy Simel, Assistant Attorney General, Anchorage, Alaska, for the respondent-appellee.

Before: JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., THOMPSON and KLEINFELD, Circuit Judges.


JOHN T. NOONAN, Jr., Circuit Judge:

David C. Reutter appeals the dismissal of his habeas corpus petition by the district court on the ground that he failed to exhaust his claims in the state courts. As the issue of exhaustion is a recurrent problem, this opinion affords the opportunity to illustrate how specifically the state claims must be raised before the state supreme court. Finding that Reutter was sufficiently specific as to one claim but failed to exhaust another...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases