U.S. v. SCHWEGEL

No. 97-1082.

126 F.3d 551 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America v. Joseph SCHWEGEL, Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Decided October 7, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. McColgin (argued), Elaine DeMasse, Maureen Kearney Rowley, Defender Association of Philadelphia, Federal Court Division, Philadelphia, PA, for Appellant.

Michael R. Stiles, Walter S. Batty, Jr., Ewald Zittlau (argued), Philadelphia, PA, for Appellee.

Before: ALITO, LEWIS, and McKEE, Circuit Judges.


OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the question whether under 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a)(4), as amended in 1994, a district court, in imposing a term of imprisonment upon revocation of supervised release, is required (in the absence of grounds for departure) to impose a term within the range indicated by U.S.S.G. § 7B1.4 (Policy Statement). Prior to the 1994 amendment, we held that the sentencing ranges set out in U.S.S.G. § 7B1...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases